In June of 2022, Michigan’s DNR announced the state’s plan to expand Camp Grayling by 253 miles, doubling the size of the Michigan Army National Guard Base.
The expansion was broadly opposed by local residents, local officials, legislators, environmental organizations, and even state regulatory officials.
In late 2022, the head of EGLE’s Gaylord office advised the Army National Guard’s Cleanup and Restoration Branch that state officials should reject the expansion proposal due to the Guard’s “inability to take timely action to investigate, mitigate, and remediate significant areas of contamination at Camp Grayling.”
While the wave of opposition did stave off the full expansion, the DNR did end up giving the military base access to 52,000 acres of land for training. In April 2023, the DNR announced that it had denied Camp Grayling’s lease of 162,000 acres, but had simultaneously signed over access to 52,000 acres in a memorandum of understanding (MOU). This expansion has since been hotly contested by locals and environmental organizations–most notably Anglers of the Au Sable.
In their April 2024 request for administrative appeal on the DNR’s MOU, Anglers stated that the increased military exercises on 52,000 acres of state land would result in “a rain of pollution on the headwaters of one of the most famous and most-loved trout streams in the United States, as well on the lands and waters of permanent residents, seasonal residents, and participants in outdoor activities for which the area is justly famous and desired.”
Camp Grayling officials have a demonstrated history of acting with bias against their community due to age and income. As Anglers observed in their April 2024 request, of the Environmental Assessment prepared by Michigan Air National Guard for the MOU with the DNR:
“The EA uses a flawed population model relying on what it claims to be a decreasing and aging population of the affected area. The EA fails to account for tens of thousands of seasonal residents, hikers, bikers, hunters, fishers, and outdoor lovers who support the local economies whose lives, outdoor experience, and property values would be adversely affected by the proposal."
Anglers also state: "We are well aware of the past Guard air activities. We also know that science has progressed and we understand more today than 40 years ago about the impacts on wildlife and humans of noise and pollutants from jet fuel and chaff spread in these exercises.”